Analytic outsourcing has come into
prominence in recent years with the growing independence of the KPO
(Knowledge Process Outsourcing) segment of the BPO (Business Process
Outsourcing) market as an independent sector of its own right. The
multi-billion dollar KPO market in India is dominated by both established
names in consulting and outsourcing as well as some newer players. Firms
like Evalueserve (www.evalueserve.com),
Genpact (www.genpact.com), McKinsey &
Co (mckinsey.com) and Accenture (accenture.com) are leading the pack in this
sector, while traditional BPO companies like TCS, Wipro, Infosys, WNS and
EXL are also making a push into this sector, driven by the higher margins in
KPO projects. Other countries such as China, Russia, Poland, the Philippines
and Hungary are also ambitiously pursuing KPO opportunities, but India still
has the lion's share of the global KPO market.
With the prolific outsourcing of more
and more analytic functions to external vendors, it becomes important to
understand the ramifications of the decision to outsource analytics to
onshore or offshore units (either captive or independent) for companies vs.
conducting it in-house. Let's first of all understand why this decision is
very different from other types of outsourcing.
Differentiating a Business
Process vs. Knowledge Process from an Outsourcing Perspective
Business Process Outsourcing entails
taking a routine business process that is consistently repeatable, follows
standard industry procedures and doesn't require client-vendor interaction
on a regular basis and outsourcing it to an external entity. Knowledge
Process Outsourcing on the other hand entails processes that are not
consistently repeatable, do not necessarily have standard industry norms of
execution, require more frequent client-vendor interaction and require a
high degree of custom expertise that doesn't necessarily form the curriculum
of standard business education. An additional point of difference is that
BPO projects contain modules that can be separated and assigned to different
entities with much more ease than KPO projects, especially analytic projects
where modules are exponentially more integrated. KPO projects also have
higher visibility within C-level stakeholders at end-clients than BPO
projects.
Is Analytic Outsourcing For You?
There are several factors to be
considered in evaluating the decision to outsource analytics vs. retaining
it in-house:
-
Access to or ability to assimilate
analytic talent in-house
-
Ability to constantly update in-house
talent with latest analytic developments and techniques
-
Availability of necessary data
in-house and capability to organize it
-
Financial Cost vs. benefit of
conducting analytic research in-house
-
Risks from outsourcing research
function
-
Advantage of third-party unbiased
opinion and access to industry best-practices available to external
vendors
With all the opportunities for
efficiency, there are a few strategic disadvantages being overlooked by
several business organizations that have outsourced a significant amount of
their analytics to offshore entities. For instance, analytic projects often
have the tendency to yield corollary business insights that may not have
been the original goal of the analysis. The persons and entities within the
organization may be the most qualified to identify and leverage such
opportunities, compared to external vendors. This is especially important to
firms where innovation is a critical part of the business model.
Long-term Outlook
The proliferation of analytic
outsourcing is inevitable in the long-term, as firms try to focus on their
core competitive advantage and leverage comparable yet cheaper talent in
offshore markets. At the same time active firms that do not outsource the
entire analytic process but manage to retain insight generation at a
strategic level should prove to have somewhat of an edge over passive firms
that outsource the entire analytic insight generation process. This will
especially be an advantage during turning-points in industry and shifts in
economic cycles and trends, which will require a deep understanding of all
facets of the business and a rapid development and execution of appropriate
strategic changes. Also the best KPO firms to partner with will be the ones
that do not follow a "black-box" approach to analytics, but are willing to
allow some level of scrutiny to their process (of course within the limits
of Intellectual Property protection constraints).